• Skip to main content

James Kullander

Writing and Inspiration

  • My Writing
    • The River Between Us: A Novel
    • Essays
    • Interviews
    • Anthologies
  • My Inspiration
    • Food
    • Underlined Sentences
  • About Me
  • Be In Touch

here and there

Here & There June 2009

By admin

I am on the road. Back on the road. The road. The road. The road. The repetitiveness is a comfort and a guide, like the beating of a distant drum communicating itself to me the secrets of life I’ve yet to learn. I may be skimming the surface of the earth but I am also going deep within myself. I have been here before but at the same time I am stepping into new ground.

It is late spring, early evening. I notice the light is lingering, taking on summer’s languid, honey-colored glow. That makes me happy. But I wonder if I am seeing things because I am traveling north, in the wrong direction at this time of year after having just endured a long winter. I am going back into the cold, maybe back in time—back to some winter long ago and to something I’d dropped in the deep snow, the blizzard of my thoughts and emotions and desires, could not find, got busy, and left it there. Maybe it is something I love.

So, back I go. I must have been 8 or 9 years old when I began to like driving. On some summer Sundays my aunt and uncle would visit from their home in Bronxville, New York and we’d all spend a leisurely late afternoon roaming the winding roads through the Connecticut suburbs where my family lived. On some evenings my dad would drive us to town for ice cream. We owned a convertible in those days. I was thrilled to be out in the open, in the wind that whipped my hair and the sun that flashed though the trees that canopied over the roads. It was perhaps my first love—inspired, emotional, instant.

One day when I was 12, I asked my mother to show me how to drive. We were coming home from the grocery store and had just turned onto the dead end road we lived on. I slid across the bench seat and she made room for me, let me take the wheel. Eventually, she showed me how to use the gas pedal and the brake. We would do this often over the years. By the time I turned 16 and was old enough to drive on my own, cars had become second nature to me, like someone who’s trained on the piano and can play anywhere, any time. Put me in a car and I’m at home. Friends are amazed at the lengths—measured in time and miles—that I can sit behind the wheel and enjoy it.

I enjoy the motion of going somewhere—as I am doing now. It does not matter where I am going. I am here. And though I am alone I feel as if everyone and everything I care for is with me—in my head, my heart. It’s as if, by some strange Newtonian law of physics, the more miles I put between me and the presence of these people and things, the more they crowd inside me. It is a lot to carry, I know. I do not travel light.

But this is a floating world, what the Japanese call ukiyo, “pictures of the floating world.” It was a popular art form in 17th-century Japan. Asai Ryoi, a 17th-century Japanese writer, describes ukiyo as “Living only for the moment, turning our full attention to the pleasures of the moon, the snow, the cherry blossoms and the maple leaves; singing songs, drinking wine, diverting ourselves in just floating, floating; … refusing to be disheartened, like a gourd floating along with the river current: this is what we call the floating world.”

The Mass Pike has drifted away behind me. Interstate 495, too. Interstate 95—Portsmouth, Portland, Augusta, Bangor—are all gone over the horizon that I glimpse in the rearview mirror from time to time. Nothing back there now but this narrow slice of road that cuts through the deep woods of Maine and rolling carpets of wild blueberry scrub. There are long grades up and down. On either side of me, the sun angles in the tall pines and on the still, dark ponds that shine black like polished ebony. The radio is off so I can hear myself think, pay attention to what’s around me. I can feel my pulse settle into a slow, steady beat as if corresponding to that distant drum that beats just below consciousness, leading me onward, inward.

We often dream of places we’d like to be, of what we will do when we get there. But it’s often the getting there that I dream about, that makes me happy, that I tell my friends and family about. Downpours, rainbows, animals, sunsets, the moon.

“There is always hope, always something better, if you keep moving”, I’ve heard people say with a snicker of cynicism. But that’s not what this is about for me. Sometimes when I am on the road, life just doesn’t get any better. I’ve no hope because I don’t need it. I’ve no expectations about any place because I am already there. And I am never disappointed because the motion always gives, and gives, and gives.

Here & There May 2009

By admin

It’s 3 o’clock in the morning and I am at the office. I’m not there because I’m working late, at least not that late. I’m there because I just woke up from a dream.

Night after night I’ve been waking up several times just after having dreamed of being in a meeting, going over my schedule of appointments or list of things to do, driving to work, emailing someone about something important (or so it seems), and impatiently waiting for a reply. Then the following morning, I come into the office and the same thing starts happening all over again, only now it’s in real life and real time. When people feel busy, they often complain they’re working 24/7. In my case these days (and nights), it seems that’s what’s happening to me. And there’s no comp time for dreaming of work.

It’s been so long since I’ve dreamed of anything but work that I’ve sometimes found myself humming “I’m Dreaming of a White Christmas” even as dozens of yellow-headed daffodils are popping up outside in my garden. A white Christmas on Easter would at least be a change of scenery.

I’m feeling so desperate that I’ve resorted to setting intentions just before I go to sleep. I ask whoever or whatever might be listening (and this is a real question for me since I live alone and have no pets) that I be visited by dreams of a sunny beach, the open road, a night on the town, falling in love—anything but a day at the office in the middle of the night, please. No luck. If there is a God, my requests are either falling on deaf ears or being ignored. I feel like I’m trapped pacing up and down the middle aisle of an all-night convenience store.

I am not having the same dream. This is not my own version of Groundhog Day, the hilarious movie in which the character played by Bill Murray wakes up each morning only to find it’s the exact same day as the day before. Each night my dreams are different. What’s the same is the theme: Work and more work. This is not funny. When I’m on vacation, I never dream that I’m on vacation. I sure hope that when I’m on my next vacation I am not still dreaming about work.

Buddhists speak of the “non-self” not as lack of identity but as an identity that is fluid. “It appears that human beings are wired to create a separate self,” writes Polly Young-Eisendrath in her book The Resilient Spirit: Transforming Suffering Into Insight and Renewal. We grasp onto a passing quality and make it, she writes, “into the essence of who we are.” What Buddhism teaches is that the idea we have of a separate unchanging self, of seeing oneself apart from others, is a fundamental root of our suffering. “We do not allow ourselves to be fully who we are; we want a definition of a self that exists and continues,” she writes.

In dreams, too, there is a sense of having this Buddhist “non-self” because you cannot tell your mind what to dream for you, as much as I’ve pleaded for that to happen. In our dreams, we don’t have a “definition of a self that exists and continues.” Your mind goes where it wants to go and you become who it wants you to be. And you can learn and grow from where you go and what you do in your dreams.

“People go to wild places in search for their true nature,” the Zen teacher John Tarrant said at a recent Omega program, Mindfulness, Love & Relationship, in New York City. “Where is my true nature?” he went on to ask. This is what he called a koan, an ancient Buddhist practice of posing a question that has no definitive answer because it has aspects that are inaccessible to rational understanding. Here’s a koan of my own: Of all the things my mind can conjure up when I am dreaming, why in the middle of the night does it take me back to the office I just left a few hours before, and will return to a few hours hence?

Maybe I can train myself to have lucid dreams. “A lucid dream,” according to the website luciddreaming.com, “is a dream in which the person is aware that he or she is dreaming while the dream is in progress. This awareness is referred to as lucidity or being lucid.” When you are having a lucid dream, you are supposed to be able to manipulate the experiences you are having in the dream. I think I like this idea. If I could lucid dream when I am dreaming about work then maybe I can see myself out of the door, get into my car, and drive home to a wonderful wife who’s just prepared a wonderful meal. We are sitting outside, the weather is warm, blue birds are singing in the trees, and the beads of condensation on the glass of a tangy Sauvignon Blanc are picking up the last salmon-colored rays of the setting sun. Talk about dreaming.

Then again, it seems to me that if you lucid dream, you miss the whole point of dreaming. Dream images come from the unconscious and, as such, have much to tell us about our lives—our desires, needs, problems that need to get resolved, even illnesses. I remember in a psychology class when I was a student at Union Theological Seminary the teacher, a psychotherapist, told a story about a man who kept having a dream of seeing a huge pumpkin on the side of the road he was driving on. Turns out the man had a huge cancerous tumor in his stomach. The moral of this story, the professor concluded, is that the man’s recurring dreams were trying to tell him something he needed to know in the symbolic language in which dreams speak. As much as I don’t like dreaming about work, I really don’t want to tell my dreams what to do. I’m thinking that lucid dreaming is just another control issue that I really don’t want to deal with right now.

“No one on his deathbed ever said ‘I wish I spent more time at the office,'” the late U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, Paul Tsongas, once said. So perhaps what I need to do is let a little reverie into my life, to take a moment or two out of my day or night to give myself what the French philosopher Gaston Bachelard called a “psychic détente.” Instead of burning the candle at both ends, perhaps when I wake up from a dream in which I am at the office, I need light a real candle and gaze into its flame and soft pool of light for a while.

“There is no well-being without reverie, no reverie without well-being,” Bachelard writes in his On Poetic Imagination and Reverie. “We discover, by reverie, in the first place, that being is good.” And a lit candle can take us there. “One may well be interested in the inner swirls surrounding the wick, and see in the depth of the flame stirrings where shadow and light struggle,” Bachelard goes on. “But every dreamer of flame lifts his dream toward the summit. It is there that fire becomes light.”

Here & There March 2009

By admin

I’ve been poring over the journals I’d kept when my former wife and I lived in China in the late 1980s. I do this nearly every year about this time as a way to remind me of one of the most gratifying, although difficult, periods of my life. Twenty-three years ago, we landed in Beijing and walked into university jobs teaching English as a second language without any knowledge of Chinese or experience teaching anything. We were either courageous or crazy, I don’t know which. But when it was over I knew it had been a life-changing time.

During the nearly two years Wanda and I were there, we were able to set aside many of the concerns and questions we had about our careers, about where we’d like to settle down, about whether or not we were going to have a child. We went to China at a point in our lives when we wanted to do something really different, to have an adventure. We got that. Also, Wanda was a Chinese-American who still had distant family in China whom we wanted to get to know. We got that, too.

When it came time to leave China, we decided to make our way back to the States by going West through the Soviet Union (it was still the Soviet Union then), as well as Scandinavia—to see some of my ancestral land. We would then get a cheap flight out of Amsterdam back to New York.

Our arrival in Copenhagen coincided with a visit there by my aunt and her husband from North Carolina. We met them in their hotel restaurant, an expensive place with white linen tablecloths and candlelight; it was the sort of restaurant Wanda and I had not set foot in for almost two years. And it was this particular evening that stands out in many ways above the so many of the other things that had happened to us while we’d been away simply because, perhaps, of its blow.

I don’t remember, but I’m sure we looked quite shabby. I do remember that we felt worn out. If life in China wasn’t enough to grind us down—it was in many ways a soul-killing, back-breaking, totalitarian country then—we’d just spent three weeks on an Odyssean journey aboard trains and crashing in cheap hotels and even spending the night in a couple of plastic seats on a small cruise liner during a sleepless overnight trip, all of it with a ton of luggage in tow. We must have looked like refugees. Even our best clothes had become threadbare and stained, and our hair had been hacked at by a Chinese friend back in Beijing, who had something of a knack for hairdressing. That was fine for China, but I know we did not look nearly as well-coiffured as the people around us now. We were also broke—we would stuff our pockets and daypacks with food from the continental breakfasts we got at the small hotels we stayed in along the way so we’d have something to eat for lunch and dinner—and we were looking forward to a lovely, relaxing, sit-down meal paid for by someone else.

It didn’t take long for the conversation about our “China thing”—that’s what my aunt called it, our “China thing,” like it was something you did when you were young and irresponsible, and then moved on—to draw a bead on what Wanda and I were planning to do when we got back the States. My aunt was an academic. She had a doctorate in education and worked in the administration of several colleges and universities in her career. My uncle was an executive with Dupont. My aunt had married late and never had children of her own. He was on his second marriage (his wife had died several years before) and had two grown daughters who were now married. My aunt’s reference to our transformative, mind-boggling time in China as our “China thing” struck a nerve in me from the get-go, and I was about to learn that it was just the beginning of a conversation that I soon wanted to stop, even it meant getting up from the table and walking out.

“So what are your next plans?” my aunt asked.

It seemed like an innocent question and I answered cheerily, “Your guess is as good as mine. Got any suggestions?”

“Don’t you think it’s about time to start thinking about little ones?” she asked suddenly.

“I have thought about them quite a lot, actually,” I said, trying to be polite. It was true. It was the subject of many conversations Wanda and I had been having for several years—even before we were married—and I always came to the conclusion that I really wasn’t interested in having a child, but still remained open to the possibility. But I did not want to talk about that just now.

“And?”

“I’m not sure.”

“Well, it’s time you decided, don’t you think?”

“Wanda and I made an arrangement in which I have to tell her by April 2 whether or not I want to have kids,” I said. This conversation in the restaurant took place on August 13, 1987. I have no idea now why we picked April 2. I don’t even recall making that agreement. But it’s in my journal that I was keeping of that time and in which this entire conversation is recounted.

“Good for her,” my uncle chimed in, winking at Wanda.

“How old are you?” my aunt asked me.

“I’m thirty-four.”

“Too old,” Wanda joked.

“Not too old,” my aunt said.

“Shucks,” I said.

“The trouble is this,” my aunt said. “My father had me when he was 33. By the time I reached 20, he was already in his 50s.”

“You can’t turn back the clock so you don’t have to go into that,” I said, my bile rising. It might have been the wine. Did I have wine? I cannot recall.

“What I’m saying is that there is a point in which you have to get on with your life,” my aunt continued. “It’s important that you do something, have commitments, or make a contribution so when you are old you can look back and say you’ve done something to make the world a better place.”

Jesus Christ. “What do you think I’ve been doing in China all this time?” I snarled. “You have no idea what a foreigner can do for people there. I personally got one person into the United States to study.”

“A drop in the ocean,” my uncle sneered.

“So be it,” I said.

“You’re afraid of having children because you’re afraid you won’t be a good parent,” my aunt went on.

“That’s part of it,” I admitted.

“That’s all of it,” she shot back.

“It’s not all of it,” I replied. “I don’t necessarily even like children.” It was not entirely true. I just didn’t want the responsibility of taking care of children.

“I know you and you’ll be the first to fall. You’re such a softie,” my aunt said.

“Maybe not,” I said. “I have a very short temper. I can’t stand to hear a baby a cry. Every time I hear a baby cry my blood begins to boil and my heart starts pounding and my palms begin to sweat. I have to get up and leave the room.”

“It’s different when it’s your own,” she said.

“Yeah, it’s worse because you can’t leave the room.”

“There’s a change that takes place,” my uncle said. “You feel different about it.”

“I don’t have a very good image of family and child rearing,” I said.

“I know that,” my aunt said. Yes, she knew that, I thought. “But why deny yourself a family just because you have a bad image of one?”

“Here’s a chance for you to start over, to prove that can have children and be happy,” my uncle added.

“That’s a good point,” I agreed. They’d touched a soft spot in me. “I’ve heard that before and I think it’s a good point.

“Kate’s husband didn’t want children,” my aunt said. Kate was one of my uncle’s daughters. “But now you can say no wrong about his little John. He just adores the boy.”

“Listen,” I said, getting my back up again. “I know all about what you are saying. I know we’re a selfish generation and a lot of us run around afraid to make commitments. But that’s not my reason for not wanting children. The reason is not because I’m afraid of being a bad parent or afraid of making a commitment. It’s because I don’t want to spend my life raising children. I just don’t think I would enjoy it all that much.”

“Well….” my aunt began, and then let her sentence drift off.

“And I don’t like this thing about getting on with one’s life,” I continued. My final salvo, the last of my ammo. “There is no point in which one gets on with life. This is my life. I went to China and it was part of my life. So I don’t know what you’re talking about when you say one has to get on with one’s life.”

The conversation suddenly stopped. Had I won? After a moment of uncomfortable silence, my aunt made some comment about the food or the weather—like a white flag of surrender, the delirium of someone in the throes of death—and my uncle either agreed or disagreed, I don’t recall because my mind was spinning and overheated. If I had won, what did I win?

Finally, I wanted to say something that spoke to the journey we’d just made, to get back to what was really most important for me at that moment and about which I had some authority that they didn’t. I was feeling desperate to tell people what I saw—things that they had no knowledge of and I felt needed to be known about real life in Communist China and the Soviet Union—and it came not from books or from other people telling me about it; it was based on my own experience and nothing and no one could refute what I knew simply because it had happened to me.

“You might be interested to know that everything bad you’ve heard about the Soviet Union is true,” I started, a bit lamely. “There are lines for everything.” I knew because we had to wait in them.

My aunt immediately replied, “The longest line we’ve had to wait in was to go to the bathroom. The bus pulls into a stop and everybody gets off and runs to the john.”

“There’s a toilet on the bus but they don’t let you use it because it has to be emptied,” my uncle added.

And that was the end of our talk about the Soviet Union, China, and everything Wanda and I had done and seen and that was now so much a part of my life it inhabited my viscera like nothing had before. I could feel that my brain had been rewired by the experience, but there were so many loose wires still. Even so—or because of this—I had so much to tell. And neither of them cared a jot about any of it.

I don’t remember what I ate or drank that night. I’m sure my aunt and uncle picked up the tab and I’m sure I thanked them for it, and I really was grateful. But when I left them I felt embittered. It wasn’t simply the subject of the conversation—children—that irritated me. It was their lack of curiosity in who I was and what was really on my mind then.

***
It wasn’t long after that meeting that my aunt, a heavy smoker most of her life, was diagnosed with lung cancer. By the time it was discovered, it had metastasized to her brain. The last time Wanda and I saw her in her hospital bed—and the first time since our dinner in Demark—she was a bald, emaciated form with wide eyes that stared blankly out the window at the yellow pines outside. Now she did not even know who we were. After her funeral, I never saw my uncle again. Always a bit of a drinker, he besotted himself in his years alone and presently died from complications due to alcohol poisoning.

I don’t know what, in their final hours, they believed they’d done to make the world a better place. My uncle gave the world two daughters, and giving life is always a blessing. Perhaps my aunt was so keen on me having a child because she knew the pain and longing it had caused her to not have one herself. If this were the case, I wish now she’d just come out and said so. As it was, I felt so resentful about that talk we’d had in Copenhagen that I’d snubbed them. I hate to admit it, but I’d snubbed them. Which is too bad—for me and for them. We missed so much life we could have shared.

They used to visit my family and I remember when I was getting ready to go to college my aunt kept insisting that I apply to the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, where she was working at the time. I never did; I didn’t think I could get in. I am thinking now that perhaps she had a higher opinion of me than I had of myself, both as a student and as the father she wanted me to be—and I never have become.

I may have pushed them out of my life—perhaps unfairly; maybe we were poor company then—but they taught me a valuable lesson that evening: The way they’d harped on me in Copenhagen taught me that it is sometimes better to listen rather than to talk because sometimes people just need to be heard. I would have greatly appreciated it if my aunt and uncle had deferred to me a little, and let me tell them about what’d I’d just been through. Someone once said there is no pain greater than an untold story. I had a story. And I so much wanted to tell it—the invigorated yet, at the same time, the strangely sad if not wrecked version of myself who was in no way ready to start having children, for heaven’s sake. They were the first people Wanda and I met up with from back home, and they seemed more bent on getting us there and resettled than on hearing anything about where we’d been, what we’d seen, what we’d been through. It was as if they’d showed up with a clean, crisp map to suggest places for us to go when I wanted to pull out my ragged, torn map to show them the places where we’d been. So we just of sat there in the middle of nowhere, lost and arguing which road would get us where we wanted to go. Thing is, my aunt and uncle wanted us to go one way and I wanted to go another way.

Listening a little more would make the world a better place no matter what else you might want to leave behind—stadiums in your name, endowments, a park bench with your name engraved into a brass plaque. Even children. It’s usually not what you do that people remember, a friend once said to me. It’s how you treat them. And, frankly, I can’t think of anyone at any time who couldn’t use someone to hear them out.

Here & There February 2009

By james kullander

The past few weeks I’ve been thinking a lot about obsession. I guess you could say I’ve been obsessed with obsession.

The other night at home I read a magazine article about Leonard Cohen’s 1984 song “Hallelujah.” The article was a sort of a tribute to the song, offering a description of how the song came to be and about the many performers who have covered it over the years.

The first time I heard the song was 20 years after Cohen recorded it. This version was on NPR during a live performance k.d. lang was giving at Carnegie Hall during a tour promoting her 2004 CD, Hymns of the 49th Parallel. I was in my car and nearly had to pull over. I felt a soft explosion in my heart and my entire body seemed to get caught up in a vertiginous swirl of thought and emotion I couldn’t stop—and didn’t want to stop because that kind of surrender just felt so good. I bought the CD and listened to it—and “Hallelujah”—on and off (more on) for about two years. Then one day I took it out of my CD changer and gave it a rest. I’d had enough.

When I opened that magazine article the other night, I lost myself all over again. Maybe this is what an alcoholic feels like if he or she takes a drink after having been on the wagon for a while. There’s this gripping feeling of delight and dread, the cartoonish angel on one shoulder (Better not) and the devil on the other (Go ahead, do it). I did. After I read the article, I clicked on youtube.com to see if there were any videos of anyone singing the song.

Turns out were plenty of them. There’s not only lang’s version but there’s also one by Jeff Buckley, John Cale, Allison Crowe, Rufus Wainwright, Sheryl Crow, and even Cohen himself. Of course, I had to watch them all. Then I clicked through to some other sites to get the lyrics (they change slightly depending who is performing the song), which led me to sites that explored the meaning of the word “hallelujah” (it’s Hebrew for “praise the Lord”) and examined the song’s allusions to the Biblical stories of David and Samson. This started at about 9 p.m. When I next looked up from my computer at the clock, it was close to 1 a.m.

Where did those four hours go? People who study obsessions and addictions say when met with the object of our desire we go into a sort of trance. Is that what happened? And, if so, is it such a bad thing? What’s the difference between getting lost in a trance and simply paying attention? In Buddhism, what happened to me might be called samadhi, which is Sanskrit for the sort of mental concentration that leads to an awareness of ultimate reality and complete freedom from suffering. My mind was not wandering, scheming, wishing, dreaming. I was nowhere else but right on task with what I was doing.

I love good music. And I love to learn. I spent hours online that night because I wanted to hear a song I love played many times by many performers. And I wanted to know more about the song because that would deepen my love and appreciation for it. Is there a crime in that?

What about getting caught up in a good book? “I couldn’t put it down,” people say about reading a novel into the wee hours of the night. We commend people for that—both the writer for telling a good story and the reader for finding so much pleasure in an activity our culture holds up as one of humanity’s highest achievements. The other morning I found myself so engrossed—obsessed?—in reading a book on obsession and addiction that I forgot I had put the stove on to heat a skillet to scramble some eggs. I laughed. But if I had been online then chasing “Hallelujah” down a rabbit hole, I wonder if I would been so kind to myself.

Now, days later after giving it all some more thought, I am wondering if clicking through sites online is just another form of page turning, and I am wondering if my little adventure with “Hallelujah” was just as compelling an adventure as reading a good book. It was a sort of story I was wrapped up in—the song, its performance, creation, and hidden meanings.

The song has many others who can’t seem to get enough of it. When I last checked, one of lang’s performances had gotten 1,091,990 hits on youtube.com (I must have contributed to about a hundred of those); Buckely’s has 8,405,694 (which is more than the entire population of New York City); Cale’s (which appears on the soundtrack of Shrek) 1,763,840; Allison Crowe’s 2,973,259 views; Wainwright’s Irish performance 3,758,095 views; Sheryl Crow’s 994,143 views; Cohen’s own version (and not the best, by my lights), 6,359,846 views.

When I first heard lang sing “Hallelujah” on the radio back in 2004, I was in a relationship that wasn’t going well. It eventually ended—and it did not end well. I listened to the song a couple of years later while in the throes of another relationship that ended barely before it began. Amidst all that listening, the song gave me a profound insight into the nature of love. There’s a line in the lyrics that says “love is a cold and broken hallelujah.” I’d heard that line dozens of times before, but it struck me anew after my second break-up and has stayed with me through the years, like a tuning fork whose sound never changes—or goes away.

“If we hear a piece of radically new music enough times, some of that piece will eventually become encoded in our brains and we will develop landmarks,” writes Daniel J. Levitin in his book, This is Your Brain on Music. “If the composer is skillful, those parts of the piece that become our landmarks will be the very ones that the composer intended they should be; his knowledge of composition and human perception and memory will have allowed him to create certain ‘hooks’ in the music that will eventually stand out in our minds.”

I wonder if I listened to the song so much during those couple of years in an attempt to imagine a better outcome for either relationship, if only in my own mind. Change not the events but my perception of the events. Locate within me a level of acceptance that certain relationships—like certain roads—are not always smooth and do not necessarily lead you where you really want to go. Or maybe I listened to find solace in a world in which my broken heart felt like the only heart that was ever broken. One website I found examined the lyrics of “Hallelujah” and pointed out that the song speaks of the fact that “people are imperfect and wavering in their affections.” And those people include not just others, but also ourself.

The dictionary defines obsession as “a persistent disturbing preoccupation with an often unreasonable idea or feeling.” So I’m thinking that this is the line in the sand between a healthy enjoyment of something or a pathological compulsion. On one side there’s joy. On the other “a persistent disturbing preoccupation.”

Given that, I don’t think I’m obsessed with “Hallelujah.” I just like the song. A lot.

Amen.

***

Purchase k. d. lang’s Hymns of the 49th Parallel This CD has a lovely studio recording of “Hallelujah.” The entire CD, a collection of songs by Canadian musicians, including Neil Young, Leonard Cohen, and Jean Sibbery–all of them beautifully covered by lang–is unforgettable.

Puchase k.d. lang: Live with the BBC Concert Orchestra [Blu-ray] This DVD has an awesome live version of “Hallelujah” and many other k.d. lang favorites.

Here & There Intro

By admin

In my dream I was being drawn with great force through the sea; there were terrifying abysses, with here and there a rock to which it was possible to hold.

–Ignaz Jezower, Das Buch der Traume, quoted in Joseph Campbell’s The Hero With a Thousand Faces

Here & There is a column that appeared monthly in the e-newsletter of Omega Institute in Rhinebeck, New York, where I worked for 20 years as an editor and program developer. I will be posting new columns on my blogs, writingandmeditation.com and theleapintothevoid.wordpress.com.

The personal essays in Here & There explored the realities and ideals of living and working in two places, both as geographical locations and as places in the mind and heart.

For a long time it has seemed to me that our lives are a balancing act between the two—being here (in the moment) and there (daydreaming, spacing out—basically anywhere but here). And also between being content with where we are (the physical space in which we live and work) and who we are (self-acceptance), and wanting to be somewhere else and be someone else.

Beginning early in 2008, I spent a lot of time on the road. I had a relationship in Nova Scotia that was just beginning and a father in Florida who was dying. I usually like to drive, and in 2008 I drove the entire eastern seaboard of the North American continent several times. This column was born amidst all this coming and going as I reached for “a rock to which it was possible to hold.”

Though my father has since died and the relationship ended, the search for that place in my life—and in my mind and heart—where I feel completely at home continues to be the grist that, in its own special way, feeds my soul.

Through this column, I took readers on a journey through the warp and the woof of my life—the good, the bad, and everything in between—all within the context of my attempt to be more mindful of the things I do and the way I am.

Here & There January 2009

By admin

Here & There January 2009
By James Kullander

I know someone whose marriage is falling apart. He’s been calling me a lot to talk. He doesn’t want the marriage to end. His sentences seem to have no end, as if that’s going to keep it all together. There’s no break between one word and the next. His life one long run-on sentence that’s unraveling. So I listen.

It’s not been easy. Sometimes I get a call in the middle of the day at the office when I’m really busy. Other times, I get a call at home while I am eating dinner. Recently, I’ve been thinking that it might be best if I called him on my cell phone during my half-hour commute. That way I’d be accomplishing two things at once. While I’m driving to my house I could be listening to him go through his hell. Multitasking.

The other night when I was at home, he called. I was nearly cross-eyed after a hectic day at work. I had not called him from my car because I just wanted to listen to some music. Now, I wanted to get off the phone but I didn’t have the heart to cut him off. After about 10 minutes he said, “You’ve been divorced. How did you get through it?” No sooner had I taken the breath to answer when his phone went dead. A part of me felt relieved. But I wondered what happened. I clicked off and dialed his number. A rope thrown to a man who’s gone overboard. He didn’t pick up. I left a voicemail asking him to call back.

How did I get through it? I could feel the words of my answer coming from a place in my mind that seems like a distant country that I might never have visited, an experience I might never have had. A bad dream. My divorce began with a separation agreement in 1993 and was final the year after. I can’t say that the years have exactly flown by. I can say that a lot has happened in my life since then. Maybe it’s not so much the years that have made the distance between then and now seem like eons; it could be that the person I was then is not the person I am now.

Later that night, I began to wonder what it means to “get through” something like a divorce. Or anything else for that matter. Does it mean we emerge on the other side unchanged by what has happened? Or “un” something or other? Unrepentant? Unforgiven? And is any quality like that such a good thing? If we want to “get through” something, might that imply that we want to remain the person we were before the beginning of the event or situation we’re trying to get through? Or if we want to change, can we even dictate how we are going change? Can we determine who we want to become as simply as we key in a destination on a GPS system? Can we expect to get there without getting lost?

If I’d had the opportunity to respond, I probably would have suggested that he just take things day by day. Don’t project into the future and imagine what might be, or what might not be. Don’t look back and wonder what might have been, or could have been—or really was. Accept the loss you are experiencing now as an opportunity for something else that you cannot even imagine. The family you feel slipping from you now might be better, stronger at the end of this current struggle. You don’t know, I would have said. You just don’t know. Life goes on.

These simple things are easy for me to say now. Yet they are informed by the kind of wisdom that comes from personal experience and the experiences of others I know who have divorced or almost divorced and got back together. I know part of what’s frightening and dreadful about a divorce is that it is kind of like a death. The death of a relationship you’d once held dear. The death of the person you thought you married. The death of the person you thought you were. The death of a way of life that you’d grown accustomed to and want to hang on to, even if it’s nothing more—or nothing less—than a bad habit to which you are enslaved. The death of a great lie that obscures an even greater truth. And that truth may be something you don’t want to see.

I got a call back the following evening. The cell phone he’d been talking on had died and his cell phone is the only phone he has these days. The question he’d asked me the night before had been forgotten. In the 24 hours we’d not spoken, many things had happened in his life that he wanted to tell me about. I listened. That’s what I figured he wanted, so I didn’t even bring up his question. He didn’t want advice. Not even the story of my divorce. Just an open ear and a little of my time. Ok, a lot of my time. But if that’s all that I can give right now, then I will give it as best I can.

After all, there is really no answer to the question he put to me that would have had anything to do with his own life. I know something of what he’s going through—how it helps to talk about it—and maybe if someone calls him someday about what he’s calling me about now, then he’ll do for that person what I am doing for him now. To me there is no better lesson than that.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to Next Page »

© 2021 | James Kullander | Join Mailing List